HOME View All Genre

Book

Audiobook

GENRES 🌙 Dark

Willis E. Byrd v. Board Curators Lincoln - Supreme Court of Missouri

By Supreme Court of Missouri

Release Date: 1993-10-26

Genre: Law

(0 ratings)
Read Download
Appellant Willis E. Byrd appeals from the dismissal of his petition in which he sought judicial review of the action of the
Board of Curators of Lincoln University when it discharged him from his position as a tenured professor. The trial court dismissed
the petition as untimely under the three year statute of limitation. § 516.030. 1 The Missouri Court of Appeals,
Western District, affirmed dismissal because the proceeding is a "contested case" under the Missouri Administrative Procedures
Act (MAPA). MAPA requires that an appeal be taken within thirty days after the final decision of an agency. § 536.110.1.
This Court granted transfer. Rule 83.03. On March 4, 1987, Byrd was sent a letter by John M. Chavis, interim president of the university, informing Byrd that his
salary would be suspended effective February 13, 1987, due to a failure to perform official teaching duties. On March 12,
1987, Chavis sent a second letter notifying Byrd that dismissal proceedings had been instituted due to Byrd's failure to teach
assigned classes during the fall semester of 1986 and the academic year of 1985-86. Byrd was informed that he had ten working
days in which to make a response or request a hearing.
Pineal: Xt Open Your Third Eye

Willis E. Byrd v. Board Curators Lincoln - Supreme Court of Missouri

By Supreme Court of Missouri

Release Date: 1993-10-26

Genre: Law

(0 ratings)
Read Download
Appellant Willis E. Byrd appeals from the dismissal of his petition in which he sought judicial review of the action of the
Board of Curators of Lincoln University when it discharged him from his position as a tenured professor. The trial court dismissed
the petition as untimely under the three year statute of limitation. § 516.030. 1 The Missouri Court of Appeals,
Western District, affirmed dismissal because the proceeding is a "contested case" under the Missouri Administrative Procedures
Act (MAPA). MAPA requires that an appeal be taken within thirty days after the final decision of an agency. § 536.110.1.
This Court granted transfer. Rule 83.03. On March 4, 1987, Byrd was sent a letter by John M. Chavis, interim president of the university, informing Byrd that his
salary would be suspended effective February 13, 1987, due to a failure to perform official teaching duties. On March 12,
1987, Chavis sent a second letter notifying Byrd that dismissal proceedings had been instituted due to Byrd's failure to teach
assigned classes during the fall semester of 1986 and the academic year of 1985-86. Byrd was informed that he had ten working
days in which to make a response or request a hearing.
Pineal: Xt Open Your Third Eye

More by Supreme Court of Missouri

State Missouri v. Nila Jeanne Wacaser

Willis E. Byrd v. Board Curators Lincoln

State Missouri v. William Cullen Bridges

State Ex Rel. Jeremiah W. Nixon v. Telco

D. F. Pitts and Mattie Pitts v. William

Afscme Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional

State Minnesota v. Alvin Rud

Frost-Benco Electric Association V.

10/25/94 State Missouri V. Jahn Henri Parker

Robert Lincoln v. Railway Express Agency

04/21/92 State Missouri V. Donnie L. Blankenship

State Missouri v. Robert M. Meanor

Marriage Mabel M. Rohling v. Carl B.

Anna Barrett v. Nash Finch Company and

06/17/97 State Missouri V. Michael S. Roberts

Ervin C. anderson v. Connecticut Fire

State Minnesota v. Scott Alan Schinzing

Rena Lichterman v. James T. Crockett

Richard A. Hastings v. United Pacific

State Missouri v. L. S. Amerison

06/20/95 State Missouri V. Walter Timothy Storey

State Minnesota v. David Paul Hager

State v. Stephens

State Missouri v. Jack Leroy Riley

State Missouri v. Carolyn Williams

American Druggists Insurance Company V.

State Missouri v. William J. Hamel

State Missouri v. Bitz Richardson

Roger E. Hinkeldey v. Cities Service Oil

Robert H. Warning and Another v. Kanabec

State v. John Pankratz

State Minnesota v. Marvin William Wall

State Missouri v. Marlon Robinson

Joseph L. Koviak and Margaret M. Koviak V.

Michael Luleff v. State Missouri

Glen A. Johnson v. Jeff B. West

Willard Erickson v. Everett Knutson and

State Missouri v. Leon Grimm

State Ex Rel. Public Defender Commission

State Missouri v. Willie D. Williams

01/28/92 Donald E. Halpin V. American Family Mutual

08/20/96 State Missouri V. Michael Taylor

Georgia Capriglione v. Southwestern Bell

Violet Hagsten v. Walter Simberg and

State Missouri v. William M. Peters

Ross Withers v. Guy Pettit and Berlough

State Minnesota v. Robert C. Pietraszewski

Cretex Companies v. Construction Leaders

08/20/96 State Missouri V. Paul Kreutzer

Cecilia E. Rice v. Norman Perl and Richard

Related Articles

Pineal: Xt Open Your Third Eye